Tabloid Hack Blames Games For Ill-Educated, Bad Behaving Kids – Again, But Touches Upon ‘The Truth’

As gamers we are constantly being told by the media that our choice of entertainment is harmful in some way or another – be it eye strain, clogged arteries of general increase in tendency to commit rape – and normally I wouldn’t post anything up about such an article, but what is unusual is that this opinion piece is based upon some interesting logic. What’s worse is that for all the dreadful pigeon-holing and generic name calling there is a generally acceptable point in there… Luckily the Mirror newspaper didn’t manage to generate an article I could agree with totally, else I fear I would probably be found wibbling my lips with my underpants upon my head next week.Paul Routledge will probably find his email inbox stuffed with rants from defensive gamers by the time I write this, but I have to say that whilst 90% of the ‘article’ – and I use that term VERY loosely – there is a point made that I think deserves a bit of attention. For you see when I am reading the trashy tabloid crap that came free with my Plasticine storage box – The Mirror has been giving Plasticine stuff away through WH Smiths all week – I couldn’t help but notice this headline:

Now how could I possibly keep quickly turning the pages – I was after all only looking to see if there was anything else for free in the pages – after being told unceremoniously that children were in fact being ‘zapped’ by computer games? The article focuses mostly on the worrying rise in cases of ill-behaviour, lacking attention spans and ADHD cases in British schools. This is not scare-mongering, it deals with the findings of a teacher asking his pupils about their habits, and the results were quite worrying. There really is a huge rise in these types of students – to the point that local authorities run PRU’s (Pupil Referral Units) to deal with the kids that need more support. But how is it that there is a rise in kids going off the rails? 

It’s commonplace to find digital media being used as a scapegoat in most cases. The Internet is blamed for lack of attention, giving the jittery mouse-user the opportunity to satisfy a never-ending stream of consciousness that cannot be matched with a textbook in a classroom. The same goes for young people’s sexual preferences. Whereas my generation would find a mere glimpse of cleavage enough to fill a weekly wank-bank – unless you were lucky enough to know a bigger boy who might sell you a well-thumbed page from Fiesta or Men Only, or if you were REALLY lucky, found some by the railway tracks/canal – kids today have a wealth of filth awaiting a few button presses leading to a lack of interest that can only be satisfied by ever-increasingly obscure tastes:

You see there is undeniable evidence that supports these changes in attitude, but can we really blame any media for corrupting the Nation’s youth?  Not at all.

See while idiots like Mr Routledge may blame ‘Game Nasties’ – nice hark back to a name only recognisable by people too old to be referred to as ‘young’ these days, just to satisfy the baying middle-class, right-wing wankers – for this change, but as we know from documents like the Byron report that stated quite clearly that there was no link between media and behavioural problems there is a third party who is solely responsible for the safety and well-being of these kids, the parents. As the article goes on to say:

“Yet parents bleat about their kids suffering from ADHD and suchlike and demand statements that will allow extra hours of personal tuition – when the fault lies largely with themselves for allowing their children to destroy their growing years.

Before they clamour for special treatment at school, mums and dads should take a long, cool look at what goes on within their own four walls”

Couldn’t agree with this more.

My father and my Uncle Daryl were the main people responsible for my love of gaming, but they held that responsiblity close to their chests. I wasn’t allowed to play more mature titles until I could demonstrate an understanding of the difference between reality and fiction, my first proper violent game was Mortal Kombat II – I’d skipped the first as my mate John had it – and my mother took my to Peterborough Toys R Us to buy it for me – for a princely £44.99 – and I was allowed to play it as much as I liked once I’d helped around the house and done any homework that I had. My parents knew I was able to cope with the obviously cartoon-like levels of violence, it was so far from ‘reality’ anyways, and I was rewarded for being a good kid.

With my children I try to be careful as to what they see and hear when I am gaming, I don’t play overtly sexual/violent games with them around, but I would happily play games including Bulletstorm, Halo Reach, Crackdown 2, Fable III and Gears of War 2 without a second thought. I know my kids, and I know that they can differentiate between the game and the real world. But if I was to come back from work to find them re-enacting scenes from the games that I have played – or indeed the games that they play, my youngest has picked up the slam on the ground and shoot in the air move from Bulletstorm as something he finds amusing – and there is no harm in this. Kids *should* copy what they have experience of. I played soldiers as a kid, I would climb hills as if attacking a castle and I would throw stones into a stream like they were grenades. All of this came from the films my Dad and I watched on Sunday afternoons.

Indeed a good friend of this very site recently posted this on Twitter:

I bought MK2 on the PS3 last night. Danni wants to play it. Shall I let her?

This kind of considered approach is nothing but healthy. Opening up the situation for discussion allows gamers to share experiences and feelings on subjects that may well lead to a sharing of knowledge. Parenting should be about mutual discussion and considered opinion yet sadly an ever-creasing parental type seem to think that the digital devices are the third parent in the family unit. Is it any wonder that their sprogs grow up to be maladjusted?

Ultimately it isn’t my place to judge others, yet I constantly find myself reading articles in the papers or seeing reports on daytime TV shows that show the ‘shocking truth’ about gaming, the Internet or movies. If a parent is likely to fail their children then that child will fail, no matter how good the ‘system’ is. We can’t blame digital media for bad parenting, because these parents’ parents obviously did something wrong themselves, and they didn’t have these excuses. Call it bad blood, call it lack of education, call it what you like, but don’t blame the game.


15 thoughts on “Tabloid Hack Blames Games For Ill-Educated, Bad Behaving Kids – Again, But Touches Upon ‘The Truth’

  1. By all accounts, I should be a mass murdering serial rapist for the games my parents let me play.

    Instead I’m a Data Communications Engineer working for a global technology company. I believe there was a related article recently published on Rock, Paper, Shotgun, about Quake and how it changed someone’s perspective on youth. It’s a good read and I can only echo it.

      1. Well as I say in the piece, there is a mention of parental responsibility, but not enough. Essentially blaming parents won’t sell enough parents – blame huge media products and bam, instant angry right-wing reactists.

  2. Well, yeah that’s what i meant, this broken record is getting old, ide love to read that someone had tried to actually do something about it, raise awareness that parents shouldnt be letting their 5 year olds play modern warfare 2, etc. I don’t necessarily agree with some things being rated 18 for example, but kids that are well below an age that would be able to handle things mentally are playing things like that all the time.

    1. Other then MW2 being a completely fucking shit game, and you’d have to be a stupid cunt to like it therefore play it… why would you NOT let a 5 year old play it?

      Take into account it’s a completely fucking stupid game which is clearly fictional, and designed for fucking idiots and children? Disney animate better cartoon turds then MW2.

  3. How old are your kids? My eldest is 5 (almost 6) and I would not let him near Gears of War 2. Although it’s very much down to the individual kid and how you think they’ll react. My gut says about 12 for that particular game for my boy.
    Back when I were a lad graphics were obviously nowhere near what we have now. The realism does make a difference. MK2 is very violent, but the cartoonishness of it made it have much less impact.
    I’ve found that my gaming has basically stopped. We have one tv so there’s rarely a point when it’s not being watched or there are kids in the same room as it. Which has restricted my gaming to racing/sports games and the Wii. And that’s pretty much all I let my boy near at the moment, Mario, Lego games and Burnout Paradise/Forza 3, and recently, Zelda.

  4. My eldest is just about to turn ten, second eldest is 8 later in the year. I wouldn’t let them play Gears etc… I just consider them to be so fantastical that I can play them with kids around – not just sitting watching obviously – without it doing any harm.

    When it comes to games such as Condemned, Silent Hill, Heavy Rain… that kind of thing, there is a No-Go area there.

      1. Yeah, I think it’s fair to say that when they were at that age I did end up playing a LOT of family games – Lego ones mostly – which was fine, and in all a good family experience.

  5. In fact I was impressed that Bulletstorm offered an option to remove the salty dialogue, as did Brutal Legend. I find the quotable stuff has more of an influence on my kids than the ‘visuals’ but then that could come down to the fact that they don’t sit and watch.

  6. Whilst I don’t have kids you have written a really interesting piece there and I think that if the mirror wants to write another piece like they did they should get you to write it

  7. But the option to remove the language on Brutal Legend didnt really remove it, it just bleeped it, and given that the game definately has intentional attempts at humour, i would put it down to their attempt to play up the effect that things like south park and family guy are actually funnier when bleeped.
    I don’t have kids, but i would think that the bleeping of swear words, whilst being amusing to them, only serves to actually heighten their attention that a ‘dirty word’ has been said.

    That reminds me, i must *BLEEP!*ing dig out BL and give it another wirl, it’s definately a *BLEEP!*ing awesome game that i never havent played it in a long time. I’m *BLEEP!* at making sure i finish a game before i drop it.

    1. Aye, my kids know there is swearing in those games, but it stops them actually taking the words and using them at school – not that I think they would do consciously obviously – instead it comes across, as you stated, as more amusing.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s